<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charlie Kaufman&#8217;s &#8216;Adaptation&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2008/01/charlie-kaufmans-adaptation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2008/01/charlie-kaufmans-adaptation</link>
	<description>through the barking glass</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rae</title>
		<link>http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2008/01/charlie-kaufmans-adaptation#comment-8130</link>
		<dc:creator>rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2008/01/charlie-kaufmans-adaptation#comment-8130</guid>
		<description>Yes, I second Peter's recommendations.

The structure of the movies makes it difficult to recommend one over the others. I think of the three, I would rate &lt;a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0338013/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; slightly higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I second Peter&#8217;s recommendations.</p>
<p>The structure of the movies makes it difficult to recommend one over the others. I think of the three, I would rate <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0338013/" rel="nofollow"><em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</em></a> slightly higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
