Comments on: The March of Technogoly! http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly through the barking glass Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:33:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: rae http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-55 rae Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:20:15 +0000 http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-55 Hey, I think it worked! :-) Hahahah.. when I tried to post the above right away I got this error message: "Sorry, you can only post a new comment once every 15 seconds. Slow down cowboy." Hey, I think it worked! :-)

Hahahah.. when I tried to post the above right away I got this error message: “Sorry, you can only post a new comment once every 15 seconds. Slow down cowboy.”

]]> By: rae http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-54 rae Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:19:33 +0000 http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-54 Ya, I should try to fix the approval thing. It's supposed to only do that for comments with URLs in them (i.e. spam). Okay, I've changed the options. Now it should only require approval for never-before-approved authors. That seems like a good idea. Ya, I should try to fix the approval thing. It’s supposed to only do that for comments with URLs in them (i.e. spam). Okay, I’ve changed the options. Now it should only require approval for never-before-approved authors. That seems like a good idea.

]]> By: dwjoyes http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-53 dwjoyes Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:31:07 +0000 http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-53 Okay, problem. I'm logged to this blog as admin and I still have to approve my own comments by email. Dumb. Okay, problem.

I’m logged to this blog as admin and I still have to approve my own comments by email.

Dumb.

]]> By: dwjoyes http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-52 dwjoyes Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:27:20 +0000 http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-52 Yeah, I seriously don't think that MT was tested across the internet during various periods of load and latency. Some of the processes seemed designed to work optimally only if the server was under the next desk and on the same subnet. It seemed like they were trying to emulate an ordinary executable UI for ftp or something. I mean, separate dialog boxes for "Do it", "Really do it?, "Doing it" and "Done. Do it again?" Come on, it ain't an ad hoc desktop app somebody threw together to ream out a database. Puh-leeze. (Ooh, I get to save in WP again...) Yeah, I seriously don’t think that MT was tested across the internet during various periods of load and latency. Some of the processes seemed designed to work optimally only if the server was under the next desk and on the same subnet. It seemed like they were trying to emulate an ordinary executable UI for ftp or something.

I mean, separate dialog boxes for “Do it”, “Really do it?, “Doing it” and “Done. Do it again?” Come on, it ain’t an ad hoc desktop app somebody threw together to ream out a database.

Puh-leeze.

(Ooh, I get to save in WP again…)

]]> By: rae http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-51 rae Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:00:27 +0000 http://barker.tnir.org/archives/2005/02/the-march-of-technogoly#comment-51 Ya, the speed makes it MUCH more attractive to blather on and on several times a day. It's surprising how much something so seemingly simple as "rebuilding" a site can have such a negative effect on your desire to post entries. Ya, the speed makes it MUCH more attractive to blather on and on several times a day. It’s surprising how much something so seemingly simple as “rebuilding” a site can have such a negative effect on your desire to post entries.

]]>